Cheltenham Hustings: The UOG Political Debate!

Ahead of the general election for the Cheltenham constituency a debate, set up by the University of Gloucestershire, took place at Park Campus on Tuesday 26th. 

MP candidates present for the hustings included Alex Chalk (Conservative), George Penny (Labour) and Max Wilkinson (Liberal Democrat). The Monster Raving Loony candidate George Ridgeon was not present.

The event was opened by the University of Gloucestershire Student Union President Imaani Mitchell, who stressed the importance of the student vote and the history of low turnout: “Our voices as young voters can be powerful, so long as we use it.”

The debate was moderated by Head of the School of Media Anne Dawson. All candidates began by stating their key manifesto points in an election broadcast with the help of Journalism students Louise De Freitas and Paul Sutton. 

Also at the event was Erica Ramos, Vice President of the National Union of Students, who gave a student perspective to the panel.

Traditionally in Cheltenham, there is a two-party race between the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives. The Cheltenham constituency is always a highly contested seat with just 2569 votes separating first and second place in 2017.

Around 200 people attended to what turned out to be a humorous debate, with Conservative candidate Alex Chalk often poking fun at Labour candidate and newcomer, 22-year-old, George Penny. 

One of the biggest political discussions included different candidates’ views on how to deal with Brexit. As a hot topic in Brittish Politics, it was no surprise the issue came up early on in the debate. 

Mr Chalk, who has represented the constituency since 2015, said we can’t have a second referendum because the losing side would not accept the result. Although admitting he was grumpy about the referendum result originally.

Mr Chalk suggested, “People would fight like rats in a sack. It would divide and wouldn’t decide”.

Labour candidate George Penny said he wanted a second referendum which would offer a better deal than the Tories, protecting worker’s rights and the UK’s environmental commitments. 

Liberal Democrat candidate Max Wilkison said to “stop Brexit” and instead invest in public services such as education and focus on the environment. 

Due to the recent Extinction Rebellion protests, protecting the environment has been pushed significantly into discussion within the General Election with more and more parties recognizing the climate emergency. 

When talking about climate change, Mr Penny explained: “It’s something which matters to me on a deep and fundamental level.” 

The Labour candidate stated that the UK should be leading the world on climate change and aiming to get down to net-zero by 2030. 

Mr Wilkinson explained that the environment is the “prime issue” at this election. He said by 2030 the Liberal Democrats would ban all petrol and diesel cars and ensure 80% of energy is from renewable sources. 

Mr. Chalk claimed he introduced environmental legislation to allow Britain to be the first country in the G7 to legally commit to net-zero by 2050. He stated that the problem when it comes to the environment is reducing carbon emissions and keeping energy in homes.

With the debate taking place at the University of Gloucestershire, and with many students and lecturers attending, the topic of student fees was also addressed.

Mr Chalk defended not removing or reviewing tuition fees like his political opponents explaining it was a moral issue.

 The incumbent MP explained: “Why should the dustman pay for the duke? There is a balance to be struck about what it is moral to ask people to do. If you do slash tuition fees, social mobility goes into reverse. I don’t think that would be the fair thing to do.” 

Mr Penny, however, defined student loans as “morally wrong”. 

He said: “The fundamental point is that Alex is seeing education not as a social good but as a personal enrichment something that causes you to make more money in your career. Education at all levels is a fundamental social good and the basis of a fair, open and tolerant society.”

Mr Wilkinson argued a review was needed in order to work out what level of fees is required. 

The hustings were live-streamed by the University of Gloucestershire School of Media students and the Television Society, and available to watch here.

Be the first to comment on "Cheltenham Hustings: The UOG Political Debate!"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*